PROJECT INFORM IN OTHER MEDIA ... 2008
News in Brief
California
Progress Report,
September 16, 2008
by Dana Van Gorder, Executive Director, Project Inform
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
recently found that the United States has been under-estimating
HIV infections by more than 40 percent (per year) for
the past decade.
Here in California, the State Office of AIDS estimates
that over 40,000 Californians are HIV positive and do
not know it. The CDC estimates that these individuals
are responsible for 50-70% of all new infections, and
every day, nearly three times as many people become newly
infected with HIV as those who start taking antiretroviral
therapy. We must take action now to do something to reduce
the rate of new infections.
Many seem to believe that the AIDS crisis is only occurring
in the developing world. Clearly that is not the case.
HIV/AIDS continues to be a major threat in the United
States with some areas having prevalence rates on a comparable
scale to Sub Saharan Africa. According to a new report
by the Black AIDS Institute, the number of African-Americans
living with HIV in the United States exceeds the number
of HIV-infected people in seven of the 15 countries in
the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)
initiative.
Indeed, the new CDC data confirmed the disproportionate
impact HIV/AIDS is having on minorities, women and youth
here at home:
- African-Americans suffer seven times
the infection risk as whites. In 2006, African-Americans
accounted for 20 percent of the HIV/AIDS cases, although
they made up just 7 percent of California’s population
(California Department of Health Services).
- Latinos suffer three times the infection
risk as whites. In 2006, Latinos constituted
22 percent of HIV/AIDS infections — but only
made up 15.3 percent of the US population.
- In 1992, women accounted for an estimated
14 percent of adults and adolescents living with AIDS
— by the end of 2005, that number had grown to 23 percent.
In 2004, the only diseases causing more deaths among
women were cancer and heart disease.
- In 2006, more infections occurred among
young people under 30 (aged 13–29) than
any other age group (34 percent), followed by persons
30–39 (31 percent).
It’s clear that the time for action is now,
and until there’s a vaccine, HIV testing is
one of the most effective prevention tools we have.
Originally, the CDC recommended that high risk people
(along with those suffering symptoms) be routinely
tested for HIV/AIDS. However the agency rejected
that philosophy in 2006 recognizing that doctors
often didn't know which of their patients were at
highest risk, and more people outside the standard
risk groups (including women, minorities, and people
living outside cities) were becoming infected.
However, CDC’s recommendations didn’t
address the question of how universal screening would
be paid for. For example, Medicare doesn’t
cover routine testing under the health plan for 8.5
million federal employees or the 7.1 million disabled
people under the age of 65 in Medicare.
California has influenced the evolution of this
standard by removing critical barriers to HIV screening.
In 2007, Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law
AB 682 (Berg). AB 682 streamlined the HIV testing
process, so that medical providers could identify
Californians who were unaware of their HIV- positive
status and bring them into care and treatment, while
sustaining the fundamental voluntary nature of HIV
screening. The bill removed a major barrier to HIV
testing by eliminating the requirement of written
informed consent, and it changed the HIV testing
process in California from an opt-in system to a
voluntary opt-out system as recommended by the CDC.
This year’s AB 1894 is the critical next step
to make HIV testing routine practice — which
is critical in HIV prevention, treatment and care
efforts. AB 1894 will make California’s response
to the CDC recommendations the most proactive in
the nation by supporting an environment that requires
all group and individual health insurance plans to
pay for an HIV test regardless of whether the testing
is related to a primary diagnosis or the patient
is showing symptoms.
According to the California Department of Health,
rapid HIV testing may help to substantially reduce
the number of people with HIV who do not know they
are infected. We also know that when people learn
they are HIV positive, they are much less likely
to engage in behaviors that will cause further transmissions.
AB 1894 passed the Assembly on August 19, 2008 (47-29)
and the Senate on August 14, 2008 (21-15).
If we are serious about preventing HIV/AIDS and
reducing new transmissions in California, we must
implement AB 1894. A South Carolina Department of
Health and Environmental Control study in 2006 showed
that most “late testers” (defined by
CDC as people who progress to AIDS within a year
of their initial HIV diagnosis) had up to five doctor
visits within the previous year or longer before
being tested for HIV. We simply cannot allow these
missed opportunities within our health care system
to continue.
California is known around the country and the globe
as being a leader in important policy matters — and
this issue should be no different. Signing this legislation
will encourage more providers to screen their patients,
which will help diagnose more individuals as early
as possible when treatment is most effective. It
will also help California create an environment that
reduces the tragic stigma associated with HIV/AIDS.
Project
Inform urges the Governor to sign AB 1894 to equip
doctors and other health care providers with this
necessary tool to help all Californians know their
HIV/AIDS status, access treatment if needed, and
reduce the risk of transmission.